
Writing a technical paper may not be easy but it is relatively straightforward because of a clear focus. Writing a report may be demanding but there is (usually) enough research data and information lying about to support a decent submission.
But writing a qualitative policy paper? Well, even for the best of staff writers (in government or major corporations), it is a tough task because there is neither a clarity of objective as afforded by a technical paper nor an abundance of evidence as supplied for a standard report. How worse, then, would it be for a young officer plying the trade of policy writing for the first time?
A policy draft, which can take the form of a strategy, doctrine or simply an uncharted brand new idea, is an arduous writing challenge because its objective may be unclear or multi-faceted; its direction may be ambivalent; and its content is devoid of quantitative support. The overworked policy writer has to summon her imagination, forward her qualitative arguments and sting with her persuasive summation just to get the attention of her approving authority. Skip a beat, and the whole argument is flawed. Burden it with details and the paper is deemed overloaded. Surely there is a (short cut?) way to write smart without writing hard?
Quality writing happens when you lack substantive data and factual evidence. You need to apply persuasion over precision. This is the heart of Policy Drafting.